Legal Opinion

Davisworth v. City of Lexington

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 7, 1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

Appellants, in this declaratory judgment proceeding, seek to have declared void a 1948 ordinance of the City of Lexington increasing the rates charged for use of its sewer system by property owners living outside the city limits. The Circuit Court (Special Judge Jay Harlan sitting) adjudged the ordinance valid. Reversal is urged on two grounds: (1) the ordinance violates a pre-existing contract between the City and the npn resident users of the service, and (2) the new rates fixed are arbitrary, unreasonable, excessive, and discriminatory.

For a number of years…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Childs v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. City of Phoenix v. KasunArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  3. City of Henderson v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  4. Dyer v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  5. Creekmore v. Central Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Faxe v. City of GrandviewWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State v. City of MelbourneSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Forest City v. City of OregonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Handy v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  5. Southgate Water District v. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API