Legal Opinion

State v. City of Melbourne

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 6, 1957PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

93 So.2d 371 (1957)

STATE of Florida, Appellant,

v.

CITY OF MELBOURNE, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A.

March 6, 1957.

Murray W. Overstreet, Kissimmee, for appellant.

W.J. Vaughn, Melbourne, and Mitchell, Pershing, Shetterly & Mitchell, New York City, for appellee.

TERRELL, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a decree of the Circuit Court of Brevard County validating an issue of Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series A, of the City of Melbourne, Florida, which will hereinafter be referred to as the "City". Said bonds were dated November 1, 1956. There is no controversy about the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Texarkana v. WigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. City of Englewood v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  3. City of Montgomery v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Fulghum v. Town of SelmaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. City of PensacolaSupreme Court of Florida · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. City of SunriseSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. State v. Miami Beach Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Beaumont v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  4. State v. Florida State Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  5. Application of Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API