Legal Opinion
Purviance v. Compton
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 10, 1928No. Docket No. 6268PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendants upon the sustaining of the demurrer without leave being given to amend.
The plaintiff, a chiropractic practitioner, seeks an injunction against the defendants, members of the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners. The action sought to be enjoined is the threatened act of placing on trial as to a fact, and the passing judgment upon such proof, in the investigation and revoking of plaintiff’s license to practice chiropractic in this state.
The Chiropractic Act (Stats. 1923, lxxxviii; Deering’s Gen. Laws 1923,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte WhitleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Brecheen v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- County of Los Angeles v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Department of Public Works v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Barendt v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Citizen's Club v. Welling, Secy. of StateUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- Hallinan v. MellonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Sharpe v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934