Barendt v. McCarthy
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants. The complaint alleged that Arthur H. Barendt was a member of the board of health of the city and county of San Francisco duly appointed; that the mayor and chief of police of that city and county had, in the absence of the health officer and the members of the board of health, broken into the headquarters of the board and had placed in possession thereof Arthur M. Sharp as a pretended successor of plaintiff and other persons assuming to succeed plaintiff's associates. The complaint further averred that the appointees of the present…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sheridan v. ColvinIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- White v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Cochran v. McClearySupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Morton v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Moulton v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Citizens Utilities Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Hallinan v. MellonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Brierley v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Warren v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.