Legal Opinion
Kieffer v. Kieffer
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 11, 1975No. 9141PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YEAGLEY, Associate Judge:
We review on this appeal the Superior Court’s refusal to reduce the alimony and support award payable by Charles C. Kief-fer, the appellant, to Barbara D. Kieffer, the appellee. Appellant contends (1) that the trial court erred by ignoring his 1971 and 1972 income as evidence of a change in circumstances warranting a reduction of the award; (2) that the trial court exhibited such bias as deprived the appellant of a fair hearing; and (3) that the trial court failed to make such findings of fact as are necessary to allow proper review on appeal. We find the first and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hamilton Ex Rel. Hamilton v. HamiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- Mumma v. MummaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Sheridan v. SheridanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Mozick v. MozickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- Rodenberg v. HatfieldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bentt v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Foster-Gross v. PuenteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Johnson v. WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Williams v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Bernard v. BernardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.