Legal Opinion
Foster-Gross v. Puente
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 1995No. 92-FM-1091PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Chief Judge:
Appellant, Donald Foster-Gross, seeks review of two orders of the trial court modifying custody and child support provisions of the parties’ separation agreement, which was incorporated, but not merged into their divorce decree. Foster-Gross argues that the trial court erred in failing to make written findings of fact and separate conclusions of law as required by Super.Ct.Dom.Rel.R. 52(a) (1994). He also argues for reversal on the following grounds: (1) the trial court ordered a change of residential custody without any showing of a substantial and material change of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moore v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Rice v. RiceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Cooper v. CooperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Utley v. UtleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Smith v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Duffy v. DuffyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Maybin v. StewartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Nunn Law Office v. RosenthalIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Wilson v. CraigDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Murphy v. MurphyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.