Legal Opinion
Mumma v. Mumma
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 6, 1971No. 5574PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from certain supplementary provisions contained in a judgment granting a wife an absolute divorce. The husband in this appeal does not challenge the divorce decree itself but assigns as error, portions of the judgment relating to (a) division of holdings in real property, (b) the amount of alimony and child support, (c) payment of fees to the wife’s attorney, and (d) a restriction on the husband’s visitational rights to his children.
The parties to this litigation were married in 1952 and the issue of the marriage consists of three children, all minors. During their married…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fleischman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oxley v. OxleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Wheeler v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Jewell R. Mazique v. Edward C. MaziqueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Reilly v. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Moore v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Leftwich v. LeftwichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Benvenuto v. BenvenutoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Hemily v. HemilyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Prost v. GreeneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.