Legal Opinion

Rodenberg v. Hatfield

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 1969No. 4093PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Associate Judge.

On December 17, 1964, Jean M. Roden-berg 1 filed a complaint in the Domestic Relations Branch of the trial court, later supplemented and amended, in which she alleged that appellant had defaulted in making support payments from March 4, 1964 to the time of the filing of the supplemental complaint. Appellant admitted that no payments were made during this period, his defense being that appellee was not entitled to support payments because she had remarried. At the trial by jury, after the close of all of the evidence, the trial court directed a verdict for appellee.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Mozick v. MozickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Frances C. Den v. Alfred A. J. DenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. Rodenberg v. RodenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Wilson v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kieffer v. KiefferDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API