Legal Opinion
Williams v. Williams
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 28, 1989No. 87-305PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This is the third time this case reaches us on appeal and the third time we must remand the case to the trial judge for further findings.
The first appeal, No. 83-405, resulted in a remand of the case so that the parties could file appropriate motions for divorce, and the trial judge could correct her findings regarding the payments by C. Dana Williams, appellant, under the parties’ separation agreement. Williams v. Williams, 495 A.2d 754 (D.C.1985). In the second appeal, the court affirmed the judgment awarding an absolute divorce, but remanded the case for the trial judge to make findings of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Pierce Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- George Eric Rosden v. A. LeutholdCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Pete v. United Mine Workers of America Welfare & Retirement Fund of 1950Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Owen v. OwenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Giant Food, Inc. v. JACK I. BENDER, ETC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nolan v. NolanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Dews v. DewsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Swift v. SwiftDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Murphy v. MurphyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hui Ci Li v. Chun Bong LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003