Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boulger

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2000No. 99-2241PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. “Although an indefinite suspension is [normally] warranted when a pattern of neglecting legal matters is coupled with a failure to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation, there is no pattern of neglect related to multiple clients here.” Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cicirella (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 544, 545, 715 N.E.2d 1131, 1132. Given respondent’s lack of a prior disciplinary record, absence of a dishonest or selfish motive related to his neglect, relatively isolated nature of his neglect, eventual cooperation in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. CicirellaOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Nelson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BoulgerOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Toledo Bar Assn. v. FarahOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Dayton Bar Assn. v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API