Legal Opinion
Disciplinary Counsel v. Boulger
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 2000No. 1999-2241PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 325.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BOULGER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Boulger,
2000-Ohio-347.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Six-month suspension with entire suspension stayed—Engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law—Neglecting an entrusted legal matter—Failing to carry out employment contract. (No. 99-2241—Submitted February 9, 2000—Decided March 29, 2000.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 99-02.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BoulgerOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. CicirellaOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Cleveland Bar Assn. v. CicirellaOhio Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Nelson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- Toledo Bar Assn. v. FarahOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Dayton Bar Assn. v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Cincinnati Bar Association v. Fernandez.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Disciplinary Counsel v. VanBibberOhio Supreme Court · 2026