Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Graham

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2002No. 2002-0699PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This case requires us to decide the sanction for an attorney who does not communicate to a client her professional misgivings about pursuing the client’s employment-related claims and then does not file an action the client anticipated. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline found that respondent, V. Ellen Graham of Dayton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0030454, committed this misconduct and thereby violated DR 6 — 101(A)(3) (neglect) and 7-101(A)(2) (failure to carry out a contract for professional services). Considering these infractions and respondent’s failure to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BoulgerOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Assn. v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Dayton Bar Assn. v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API