Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Graham

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2002No. 2002-0699PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 96 Ohio St.3d 470.] DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. GRAHAM. [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Graham,

2002-Ohio-4910.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—One-year suspension with entire sanction stayed on conditions—Failing to cooperate in disciplinary process—Failing to communicate to a client attorney’s professional misgivings about pursuing the client’s employment-related claims and then not filing an action the client anticipated. (No. 2002-0699—Submitted June 5, 2002—Decided October 2, 2002.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BoulgerOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BoulgerOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dayton Bar Assn. v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API