Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Manger

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 14, 2006No. Misc. Docket AG No. 50, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, by Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751, 1 filed a Petition For Disciplinary Action against William Henry Manger, the respondent. The petition charged that the respondent violated Rules 1.1, 1.3, Diligence, 2 Competence, 3 1.4, Communication, 4 1.5, Fees, 5 3.1, Meritorious Claims and Contentions, 6 and 8.4, Misconduct, 7 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, as adopted by Maryland Rule 16-812.

We referred the case, pursuant to Rules 16-752(a), 8 to the Honorable Paul A. Hackner, of the Circuit Court for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoldsboroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AgbajeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. TankoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mba-JonasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. FrammCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API