Legal Opinion

Herrington v. Hackler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 14, 1937No. 27446PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

H. W. Hackler instituted this action in the district court of Mayes county against V. D. Herrington to enjoin the defendant from engaging in the practice of medicine and surgery in violation of a written agreement.

The petition as amended alleges, in substance, that both parties are duly licensed, practicing physicians engaged in the practice of their profession in the city of Pryor. That on or about the first day of September 1934, the plaintiff agreed to buy from the defendant a hospital, and equipment, for an agreed consideration of $5,000 cash. That as a part of the consideration for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Threlkeld v. StewardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Wesley v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Wall v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Key v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Rosen v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Foltz v. StruxnessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  2. Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Vancil v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Akey v. MurphySupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  5. Coston v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API