Akers v. Rappe
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County. Lucas P. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action brought by the plaintiff to recover the sum of three thousand dollars as stipulated damages upon a contract between the defendant and the predecessors in business of the plaintiff made in partial restraint of trade.
The facts of the case are substantially these: Carl Rappe, the defendant in this action, for many years conducted in the city of Watsonville a jewelry store known as Rappe’s Jewelry Store. After building up the business he sold his store and the goodwill of the establishment in the year 1905 to a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City Carpet Beating Etc. Works v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Brown v. KlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Ragsdale v. NagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Shafer v. SloanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
3Cited by7 opinions
- Yost v. PatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Wall v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Dowd v. BryceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Loescher v. PolickySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- T.J.T., Inc. v. MoriIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.