Legal Opinion

Demoss v. DEMOSS, ETC.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1964No. 19,823PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*549Pfaff, J.

— This action was brought by appellee to annul his marriage to appellant pursuant to §44-106, Burns’ 1952 Replacement, which provides:

“When either of the parties to a marriage shall be incapable, from want of age or understanding, of contracting such marriage, . . . the same may be declared void, on application of the incapable party in the case of want of age or understanding ... by any court having jurisdiction to decree divorces ;....”

Appellant’s demurrer to the complaint, based upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, was overruled.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Music Op. Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Henneger v. LomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Pry v. PryIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. McKEE v. HASLERIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Adkins v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Indiana Waste Systems, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Edward Rose of Indiana v. FountainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Demoss v. DEMOSS, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Demoss v. DEMOSS, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Indiana Waste Systems, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API