Edward Rose of Indiana v. Fountain
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BUCHANAN, Chief Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
Defendant-appellant Edward Rose of Indiana (Rose) appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee C. Wayne Fountain (Fountain) claiming error in the trial court’s application of IC 32-7-1-7 and in the court’s determination that Rose was not entitled to withhold Fountain’s security deposit as damages for breach of a lease agreement.
We reverse.
FACTS
The facts most favorable to the judgment indicate that on February 2, 1980 the parties entered into a lease agreement whereby Fountain agreed to rent an apartment from Rose for a period of six months. Because…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Piskorowski v. Shell Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Connell v. City of LogansportIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Wayne Township v. Lutheran HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Carsten v. EickhoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Sanders v. KerwinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chesterfield Management, Inc. v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Scott v. Anderson Newspapers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Baker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Deaton v. City of GreenwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Quebe v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.