Henneger v. Lomas
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom the Allen Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, C. J.
— -Appellant brought this action against appellee to recover damages for her own *288seduction, under the provisions of section 263, R. S. 1881 (section 264, R. S. 1894). Appellee’s separate demurrer to each paragraph of the amended complaint for want of facts was sustained. Appellant refused to plead further, and judgment was rendered against her. This action of the court is assigned as error.
It is urged by appellee that the specifications in the assignment of errors are not directed to the ruling on each paragraph, but to the complaint as an entirety. While the specifications in the assignment…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Wightman v. WightmanNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
- Abbott v. AbbottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1877
- Long v. MorrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Barnett v. HarshbargerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Sutton v. LeibSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Brooks v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Sefton v. SeftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Courtney v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Koplik v. C. P. Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.