Legal Opinion

Carnley v. Brunson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 5, 1933No. 4 Div. 693PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment on the petition, after coming in of the amended answer, was for petitioner.

The rules touching the constitutionality of a statute are established in this jurisdiction, and the decisions are collected in Jefferson County v. Busby (Ala.App.)148 So. 415;2 State ex rel. Austin v. Black, 224 Ala. 200, 130 So. 431; Ex parte Bowdoin (Ala.App.) 141 So. 911;1 Ex parte Parks,225 Ala. 8, 141 So. 914.

The issues as to the sufficiency of the notice, under section 106 of the Constitution, accompanying each bill on its introduction in the House as No. 279 and in the Senate as No. 171, were…

Also in this document: Dissent · Bouldin; Dissent · Brown.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. State ex rel. Crenshaw v. JosephSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Penton v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Jones v. McDadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City R. R. v. BrombergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FriedkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Pennock v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Foreman v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. State Ex Rel. Pennock v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State on Inf. Murphy v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API