Legal Opinion

Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City R. R. v. Bromberg

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1904PublishedCited by 38 opinions

AppExíl from the Circuit Court of Mobile. Tried before1 tlie, Hon. Wm. S. Anderson. This suit was instituted by the appellee in the Circuit Co-urt of Mobile County to recover damages for the alleged negligence of the defendant, causing the death of his intestate, Arthur Robbins on the 19th day of December, 1900. Plaintiff’s intestate was employed as a brakemam by the defendant and on the morning of the accident undertook to couple two cars of tlie defendant, one a caboose…

Read the full summary

AppExíl from the Circuit Court of Mobile. Tried before1 tlie, Hon. Wm. S. Anderson. This suit was instituted by the appellee in the Circuit Co-urt of Mobile County to recover damages for the alleged negligence of the defendant, causing the death of his intestate, Arthur Robbins on the 19th day of December, 1900. Plaintiff’s intestate was employed as a brakemam by the defendant and on the morning of the accident undertook to couple two cars of tlie defendant, one a caboose equipped with a. link, and pin coupler and the other a passenger coach equipped with what is known as a “Miller hook”…

1Opinion of the CourtDowdell, J.

This, is a suit by Charles L. Brom-berg, Jr., Admr. etc., against the appellant Railroad Company, to recover damages for the negligent killing of Arthur Robbins, on the 19th day of December, 1900. The- deceased was a brakeman, and as such, was at the time of his injury in the employment of the defendant *273company, and was killed wliile in the act of coupling two cars together in the discharge of his duties as brakeman. It is alleged in the complaint that the said Arthur Bobbins was killed by .being crushed between a caboose and a passenger coach, “which were being made up in a train of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Boyd v. Nebraska Ex Rel. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Marbury Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  4. South & North Alabama Railroad v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  5. Geo. Pacific Railway Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Amerson v. Corona Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Jones v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API