Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Davis

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 14, 1939No. 4 Div. 118PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The purpose of this litigation it to test on certain grounds specified in the bill of complaint the constitutionality of local Act No. 272 (House Bill 639), approved August 24, 1939, to create an inferior court in Covington County with restricted civil and criminal jurisdiction, to operate without juries.

The two features of the Constitution thought to be violated are sections 106 and 45. Insofar as section 106 is sought to have influence, it is thought that the published notice as there required did not "state the substance of the proposed law," as it was enacted; that section 45 was violated…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. SC Hwy. Dept. v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Electric Bond & Share Co. v. Securities & Exchange Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Calhoun County v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. In Re Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. State on Inf. Murphy v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API