Legal Opinion

Hawkes v. Commercial Union Insurance

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 16, 2001PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.

[¶ 1] Commercial Union Insurance Company appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Warren, J.) denying its motion for summary judgment. Commercial Union argues that Karl Hawkes’ claims are barred by the immunity and exclusivity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act, 39-A M.R.S.A. §§ 104, 408 (Pamph.2000), or, alternatively, by settlement documents. We agree with the Superior Court that the Workers’ Compensation Act does not foreclose Hawkes’ tort claims against Commercial Union. We also affirm that portion of the Superior Court’s order denying summary…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gibson v. National Ben Franklin InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Comeau v. Maine Coastal ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. Estate of Berthiaume v. PRATT, MDSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. Cole v. ChandlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  5. Struck v. HackettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wamai v. Republic of SudanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Morgan v. KooistraSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. Maxwell v. AIG Domestic Claims, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  4. Marcoux v. Parker Hannifin/Nichols Portland DivisionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  5. Bores v. Domino's Pizza, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API