Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. AIG Domestic Claims, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 30, 2011No. SJC-10757PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

In this proceeding we consider the appeal of AIG Domestic Claims, Inc. (AIGDC), from the denial of its motion for summary judgment. Jesse Maxwell, a workers’ compensation claimant, brought suit against AIGDC regarding the company’s conduct in referring his claim to the insurance fraud bureau (EFB), communicating with fraud investigators and prosecutors regarding his activity and claim, and using criminal processes to gain leverage in dealings with him. Maxwell sought recovery on theories of malicious prosecution, infliction of emotional distress, abuse of process, and violation of G. L. cc.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Tatro v. Manor Care, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. Foley v. Polaroid Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Foley v. Polaroid Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Blackstone v. CashmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Estate of Moulton v. PuopoloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Fernandes v. Attleboro Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. Chambers v. RDI Logistics, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  4. Nguyen v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  5. Abate v. Fremont Investment & LoanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API