Legal Opinion

Estate of Berthiaume v. PRATT, MD

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 10, 1976PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

The appellant, as administratrix, based her claim of right to damages on an alleged invasion of her late husband’s “right to privacy” and on an alleged assault and battery of him. 1 At the close of the evidence produced at trial, a justice of the Superior Court granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. Rule 50, M.R.Civ. P.

Appellant’s seasonable appeal brings the case to this court.

The appellee is a physician and surgeon practicing in Waterville, Maine. 2 It was established at trial without contradiction that the deceased, Henry Berthiaume, was suffering from a cancer…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Melvin v. ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Cason v. BaskinSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. Barber v. Time, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. Hamberger v. EastmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
  5. Henry v. Cherry WebbSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Smalley Maintenance Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Lawlor v. North American Corporation of IllinoisIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Brenda Phillips v. Smalley Maintenance Services, Inc., a Corporation, and Ray Smalley, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Maine Human Rights Commission v. Local 1361, United Paperworkers International Union AFL-CIOSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API