Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Kooistra

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 5, 2008PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] John Kooistra and Terry Walsh appeal the denial of their motions for summary judgment by the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Cole, J.) on Matthew L. Morgan’s complaint for defamation. Kooistra and Walsh argue that: (1) they each are entitled to discretionary function immunity pursuant to the Maine Tort Claims Act (the MTCA), 14 M.R.S. § 8111(1)(C) (2007); (2) they each qualify for intentional act immunity pursuant to the MTCA, 14 M.R.S. § 8111(1)(E) (2007); (3) their statements were true; and (4) the Workers’ Compensation Act’s exclusivity provision, 39-A M.R.S. §§ 104, 408 (2007),…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. Lester v. PowersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  3. Mehlhorn v. DerbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  4. Rippett v. BemisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Mahar v. StoneWood TransportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gail Bierman and Beth Weier v. Scott Weier and Author Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Heidi Pushard v. Bank of America N.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. Pamela G. Argereow v. Verne M. Weisberg, M.D.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  4. Hilderbrand v. Washington County CommissionersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  5. Susan C. Harvey v. Addison H. Furrow Jr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API