Legal Opinion

Primock v. Goldenberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 5, 1924No. 24,296PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This appeal puts before us another more or less typical street intersection automobile collision case. The trial was without a jury. The findings were for plaintiff, a motion for a new trial was denied and defendant appeals.

The collision occurred at the intersection of Western avenue and Ninth street north, Minneapolis, the parties not being able to agree as to the precise point of collision, nor as to several other important circumstances. In view of its approval below, we must take plaintiff’s testimony as the basis for our consideration of the one claim urged as ground for reversal that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gibbs v. AlmstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Fournier v. ZinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Ries v. Cheyenne Cab & Transfer Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Roe v. KurtzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Carter v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Nicholson v. GarlandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API