Legal Opinion

People v. Hill

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 9, 2005No. B176701PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KRIEGLER, J. —

A jury convicted defendant Cedric Earl Hill on two counts of attempted voluntary manslaughter in violation of Penal Code 1 sections 664 and 192, subdivision (a), one count of possession of a firearm by a felon in violation of section 12021, subdivision (a)(1), and two counts of assault with a semiautomatic firearm in violation of section 245, subdivision (b). The trial court found that defendant had suffered a prior felony conviction within the meaning of sections 667, subdivisions (b)-(i), 1170.12, subdivisions (d)-(i) (the “Three Strikes” law), and 667, subdivision (a).

D…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. Christian S.California Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. OropezaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. In re Isabella C. CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. P. v. Hayes CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. People v. Bagnerise CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2021

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API