United States v. Voorhees
United States Court of Military Appeals
1DissentBrosman, Judge
I must dissent from the result reached by the majority.
II
Uniqueness characterizes the case before us here. First, it is unique in its irony. The accused officer, a lieutenant colonel, was once a high functionary in the system of censorship imposed by the Eighth Army in Korea. Now he has been sentenced to dismissal for an alleged defiance of the very Regulations it had previously been his duty to enforce. His book, “Korean Tales,” produced his present difficulties largely because of assertions contained in it to the effect that General MacArthur had been irresponsible in public statements…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.