Legal Opinion
Hammell v. City of Albuquerque
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 1958No. 6277PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUJAN, Chief Justice.
This is a suit for damages resulting from an intersectional collision between an automobile driven by plaintiff’s father in which he was a passenger and an automobile driven by Burton W. Hammell. The defendants are Hammell and the City of Albuquerque, New Mexico. The City was joined into the suit as a third-party defendant by virtue of the fact that third-party plaintiff claims that it was negligent in its failure to install a stop sign on Bridge Street where it intersects Coors Road. By his complaint the third-party plaintiff alleges :
“1. That on or about the 25th day of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bradshaw v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Auslander v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Parson v. Texas CityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Dorminey v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Hiltner v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sangre De Cristo Development Corp. v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- O'HARE v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Rodgers v. RayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Gallagher v. Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control AuthorityNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Grano v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.