Legal Opinion

Hiltner v. Kansas City

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 9, 1956No. 45089PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOCKARD, Commissioner.

Upon motion by each defendant, plaintiff’s second amended petition for damages in the amount of $35,000 was dismissed by the trial court for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Plaintiff has appealed.

The pertinent parts of plaintiff’s petition, as stated by plaintiff in her brief and adopted as a correct statement by both defendants, are as follows:

“(a) Plaintiff, while standing within a streetcar safety zone, at or near the southeast corner of 41st Street and Troost Avenue, for the purpose of boarding a streetcar operated by the defendant…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Zuber v. Clarkson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Pearson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. Hull Ex Rel. Hull v. GilliozSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Dixon v. General Grocery CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. Cassidy v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. La Plant v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Schaefer v. AccardiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Graham Ex Rel. Bodine v. ConnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Burke v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Dallas v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API