Hiltner v. Kansas City
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Commissioner.
Upon motion by each defendant, plaintiff’s second amended petition for damages in the amount of $35,000 was dismissed by the trial court for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Plaintiff has appealed.
The pertinent parts of plaintiff’s petition, as stated by plaintiff in her brief and adopted as a correct statement by both defendants, are as follows:
“(a) Plaintiff, while standing within a streetcar safety zone, at or near the southeast corner of 41st Street and Troost Avenue, for the purpose of boarding a streetcar operated by the defendant…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Zuber v. Clarkson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Pearson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Hull Ex Rel. Hull v. GilliozSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Dixon v. General Grocery CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Cassidy v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- La Plant v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Schaefer v. AccardiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Graham Ex Rel. Bodine v. ConnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Burke v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Dallas v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.