Legal Opinion

Fulton, Admistratrix v. National Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 1901PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Grayson. Tried below before Hon. Don A. Bliss.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

The material facts in this case are as follows: A. Fulton (the intestate) acquired twenty-five shares of the stock of the Denison Compress Company on October 15, 1895; fourteen shares on March 7, 1897, and twenty-five shares about May 5, 1897. He had arranged with the bank (appellee) to advance the purchase money for these shares, and in each instance they were paid for by the bank, by paying a 'draft on it for the respective sums, to which drafts were attached the certificates of stock issued in the name of Fulton and indorsed by him in blank. There were eight shares of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Logan County National Bank v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Burnett v. OechsnerTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Huyler v. DahoneyTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Williams v. LumpkinTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lauraine v. AsheTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Lauraine v. AsheTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Burner v. Security State Bank (In Re Burner)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1989
  4. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. FormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Vander Stucken v. WilloughbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API