Huyler v. Dahoney
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Lamar. Tried below before the Hon. John C. Easton. The opinion contains a careful statement of the case. The case was taken from Austin to Tyler, and decided December 4, 1877.
1Opinion of the Court
Gould, Associate Justice.
Dahoney, as administrator of Harlin, brought this suit against Beauchamp, alleging that Harlin died at Beauchamp’s house; that Beauchamp, without right or authority, took possession of four promissory notes, payable to Harlin or bearer, two on Binch, and two on Breeman, each secured by a vendor’s lien on land sold by *236Harlin; that he wrongfully demanded and received from Finch part payment in horses and stock, and finally received from Finch a conveyance of part, and from Freeman of all the land, in payment for which then respective notes were given. Finch and Freeman…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Flagg v. MannU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1837
- Garlick v. JamesNew York Supreme Court · 1815
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fulton, Admistratrix v. National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Thomson v. Findlater Hardware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- English v. PlumleeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Foot v. SillimanTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Clarke v. First State Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.