Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. Forman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1935No. 7 Div. 280PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

The bill in this cause was filed by C. B. Forman, appellee, on behalf of himself, and all other stockholders of the Gadsden Ice & Fuel Company, a corporation, “who care to join therein,” against the Gadsden Ice & Fuel Company, T. G. Jordan, Otto Agricola, J. R. McCleskey, and the First National Bank of Birmingham.

It is made to appear from the averments of the bill that the said Gadsden Ice & Fuel Company was organized under the laws of the state of Alabama on the 21st day of September, 1923, with an authorized capital stock of $100,000, divided into 1,000 shares. That the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Oden v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Holcomb v. ForsythSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Decatur Mineral Land Co. v. PalmSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  4. Wood v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. American-Traders' Nat. Bank v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Highland v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Crossland v. First Nat. Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. First Nat. Bank v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Murphy v. PickleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Goldman v. JamesonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API