Legal Opinion
State v. Page
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 12, 2005No. 0005-34282; A116871PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
Defendant was convicted of several felonies stemming from a robbery committed by two men in January 2000. He appealed, arguing that the trial court erred in admitting out-of-court statements made to a police interrogator by an unavailable witness. According to defendant, those statements were inadmissible hearsay and, further, admitting them violated his confrontation rights under the Oregon and United States constitutions. We affirmed without opinion. State v. Page, 192 Or App 603, 89 P3d 96 (2004). Thereafter (but before the appellate judgment issued), the United States Supreme Court…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- State v. LovernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. PittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. StalderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.