Legal Opinion

Rissman v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 29, 1960No. 64482; protests 58/12088 and 58/12139 (Los Angeles)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise covered by the entries involved in these protests, consolidated at the trial, consists of various earthenware articles imported from Italy in 1956 and 1957 and entered at the port of Los Angeles. The entries were liquidated on December 10, 1957, and March 14, 1958, respectively. Timely protests were filed, signed as follows:

HUDSON RISSMAN

8831 BEVERLY BLVD., LOS ANGELES [in typewriting] by H. H. Elder — Attorney in fact [in ink]

LAWRENCE & TUTTLE, ATTORNEYS [in printing]

351 CALIFORNIA STREET SAN FRANCISCO 4

The collector forwarded the protests to the court without…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United Bulb Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  2. Hudson-Rissman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Knutsen v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rissman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Rico Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. John L. Westland & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API