Legal Opinion

Rico Products Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 1, 1961No. C.D. 2236PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The protests enumerated in the attached schedule were submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel for the parties reading as follows:

*75IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States that the items marked “A” and initialed PEE (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner P. E. Eeran (Examiner’s Name) on the invoices covered by the protests enumerated in the attached Schedule “A” and assessed with duty at 10% ad valorem under Par. 405 of the Tariff Act of 1930 consist of sticks of wood similar in all…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Hill v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Brown v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  4. States v. StrausCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Communist Party of the U. S. A. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. John L. Westland & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. United States v. Barr Shipping Co.United States Customs Court · 1972
  4. United States v. Barr Shipping Co.United States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API