Legal Opinion

Rissman v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 4, 1961No. C.D. 2246PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

The protests involved in these cases, consolidated at the trial, involve articles, imported from Italy on June 25,1957, and August 26, 1956, assessed with duty at 4% cents per dozen and 23% *134per centum ad valorem under paragraph 211 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 54108, as earthenware, valued at $10 or more per dozen, which is not tableware, kitchenware, or table and kitchen utensils. It is claimed that the merchandise is entitled to free entry as original paintings or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rissman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Rohner Gehrig & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chas. Kurz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Shreve v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Amity Fabrics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. General Instrument Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. Chas. Kurz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API