State v. Bell
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*242OPINION OF THE COURT BY
OGATA, J.
These three consolidated appeals present the same underlying question: whether the prosecution is required to present to the grand jury evidence which tends to negate the guilt of the accused.
In the three cases before us, indictments were returned by the Oahu Grand Jury against each of the defendants. The defendants thereafter moved for dismissal of the indictments on the ground that evidence tending to negate their guilt was not presented by the prosecution to the grand jury. In Cases No. 6315 and 6540, Circuit Judge Doi dismissed the indictments without…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Herman ChanenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. J. Joseph Kennedy, United States of America v. Robert J. Myers, United States of America v. Lawrence F. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. NarcisoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. MelearHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. O'DANIELHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. BaumannArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. Ivonne Saavedra (073793)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- State v. Coconino Cty. Superior Ct., Div. IIArizona Supreme Court · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.