Legal Opinion
United States v. Herman Chanen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 28, 1977No. 76-2571PublishedCited by 165 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BARNES and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, * District Judge. WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
After the government had twice presented evidence to a federal grand jury and once had an indictment dismissed, a third effort resulted in the return of an indictment charging defendants Chanen, Lee and Vanlandingham with the same violations of 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspiracy to commit an offense against or defraud the United States, and of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 2, conspiring to make and making false, fictitious or fraudulent statements in a matter before a department or agency of the United…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Ernest Raymond BasurtoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. In Re Jacqueline Schofield, WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by165 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. John E. Kenny, Trenton P. Oelberg, and William L. Parker, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- United States v. Alvin Frazin, United States of America v. Ronald Mark MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.