State v. Paumier
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
¶1 Rene R Paumier appeals his conviction for residential burglary and third degree theft. This case requires us to determine if Paumier’s right to a public trial was violated when the trial court individually questioned potential jurors in chambers. We have previously held that a court may close a courtroom to the public only after considering the factors established in State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 258-59, 906 P.2d 325 (1995). Moreover, we have held in State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 19-20, 288 P.3d 1113 (2012), that individual questioning of potential jurors in chambers without first…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. MarcusSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Presley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. O'HaraWashington Supreme Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. LoveWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- In re the Personal Restraint of CogginWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. NjongeWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. FrawleyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.