Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Coggin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 2014No. 89694-1PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. Johnson, J.

¶1 In this case we must decide what standard on review is applicable in a personal restraint petition asserting a violation of the right to a public trial under article I, section 22 of the Washington State Constitution.1 Here and in In re Personal Restraint of Speight, 182 Wn.2d 103, 340 P.3d 207 (2014) (plurality opinion), prospective jurors were questioned in chambers without the trial court engaging in the analysis required by State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 906 P.2d 325 (1995). After his convictions were affirmed on appeal, petitioner William Coggin brought this timely personal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BrightmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. BrightmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Peyronel, Bobby JoeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of SchreiberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of SpeightWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State of Washington v. Dallin David FortCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API