State v. Love
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtYu, J.
¶1 This case is another opportunity to clarify our evolving jurisprudence on open courts. Today we decide if a particular method of challenging jurors after voir dire — a method commonly employed in trial courts around the state — violates the constitutional right to a public trial. At the conclusion of voir dire questioning, counsel exercised for cause challenges orally at the bench and subsequently exercised peremptory challenges silently by exchanging a list of jurors and alternatively striking names from it. All of voir dire, including the juror challenges, occurred in open court, on the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- In re the Personal Restraint of OrangeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Matter of Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. SchiermanWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. SchiermanWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. EffingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State v. MarksWashington Supreme Court · 2016
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.