Legal Opinion

State v. Love

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2015No. 89619-4PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYu, J.

¶1 This case is another opportunity to clarify our evolving jurisprudence on open courts. Today we decide if a particular method of challenging jurors after voir dire — a method commonly employed in trial courts around the state — violates the constitutional right to a public trial. At the conclusion of voir dire questioning, counsel exercised for cause challenges orally at the bench and subsequently exercised peremptory challenges silently by exchanging a list of jurors and alternatively striking names from it. All of voir dire, including the juror challenges, occurred in open court, on the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of OrangeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Matter of Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. SchiermanWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. SchiermanWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. EffingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. State v. MarksWashington Supreme Court · 2016

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API