County of Los Angeles v. Rindge Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The above-entitled actions were instituted by the county of Los Angeles to condemn certain lands described' in the complaints therein for use as highways. In each case an interlocutory judgment as prayed for was rendered for the plaintiff, followed by a final order of condemnation, from which judgment and order So rendered in each case the defendants therein have appealed.
In the first above-entitled case, and which appellants designate the “Main Road” case, the action was to condemn a strip of land from the public highway at a point on the southeasterly boundary line of the Malibu ranch, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Wulzen v. Bd. of Supervisors of City & Cty of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People Ex Rel. Herrick v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Water Works Co. v. BurkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Secombe v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. ChevalierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- City & County of San Francisco v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LagissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.