Legal Opinion
Par Fait Originals v. ADT Security Systems, Northeast, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 30, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.), entered on November 21, 1991, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, and the judgment entered thereon on December 2, 1991, is unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly found that the document dated May 31, 1989, relied upon by defendant, was a new contract between the parties and that the one-year statute of limitations contained therein is enforceable (Diana Jewelers v A.D.T. Co., 167 AD2d 965; CPLR 201). There is also no merit to plaintiffs’ claim that since they were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gillman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Furs v. Jewelers Protection Services, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Dunefsky v. Montefiore Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Diana Jewelers of Liverpool, Inc. v. A.D.T. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. v. J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Chase v. Columbia National Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- D.L. Lee & Sons, Inc. v. ADT Security Systems, Mid-South, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1995
- Corbett v. FIRSTLINE SECURITY, INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Ponterio v. KayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.