Legal Opinion
Furs v. Jewelers Protection Services, Ltd.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 12, 1992PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, defendant’s motion for summary judgment granted, and the certified question answered in the negative.
Before moving to a new location, plaintiff, a fur dealer, contracted with defendant to design, install and monitor a burglar alarm system. In December 1986, several weeks after plaintiff occupied its new premises, furs worth about $300,000 were stolen in a nighttime burglary, but the alarm did not sound. In plaintiff’s action for negligence and breach of contract, defendant sought summary…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by26 opinions
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Colnaghi, U.S.A., Ltd. v. Jewelers Protection Services, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Abacus Federal Savings Bank v. ADT Security Services, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Net2Globe Intern., Inc. v. Time Warner Telecom of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Industrial Risk Insurers v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.