Hecker v. Cortinas
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.
— Denise Cortinas appeals a permanent Domestic Violence Protection Order against her. She argues that the issuing court commissioner lacked authority and erred in granting Thomas Hecker’s petition for a protection order on behalf of himself and his wife, Carolyn McCord. Cortinas also challenges the constitutionality of the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (the Act) and asserts that she was entitled to a jury trial. We affirm.
FACTS
Hecker and Cortinas were previously married and divorced. On behalf of himself and his new wife, McCord, Hecker petitioned for and was granted a temporary protection…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Camer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Spence v. KaminskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- City of Seattle v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Spence v. KaminskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gourley v. GourleyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Gourley v. GourleyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Knight v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- In re the Marriage of StewartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. StintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.