Legal Opinion

Camer v. Seattle Post-Intelligencer

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 20, 1986No. 15814-7-IPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.

—Dorothy Camer and Margaret Coughlin appeal the trial court's order of summary judgment dismissing their libel complaint against The Seattle PostIntelligencer (The Seattle P.I.) and reporter Susan Goldberg. Camer and Coughlin allege that the court erred in dismissing their complaint because they have established a prima facie case of defamation with convincing clarity. We affirm the trial court.

Facts

The lawsuit arises out of an article written by Susan Goldberg published on June 20, 1982, in The Seattle P.I. The article is entitled "'Nuisance' suits clog the courts", and discusses the effects…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. HeppsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, Robert NovakCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Mohr v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Mohr v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Demopolis v. Peoples National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. Schmalenberg v. Tacoma News, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API