In re the Marriage of Stewart
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Under chapter 26.50 RCW, a domestic violence protection order may temporarily prohibit contact between a parent and his or her minor children. Such an order is not an impermissible modification of a parenting plan. The protection order that prohibited Wilson Stewart from contact with his children pending further proceedings in family court was authorized by the statute, supported by the evidence, and did not violate his constitutional rights as a parent. We therefore affirm.
Ellington, J.
FACTS
¶2 Nichole and Wilson Stewart1 have two children, R.S., age 13; and S.S., age 8. The Stewarts…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- In re the Marriage of HornerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Marriage of HornerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. AnciraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- In re the Marriage of DoddCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State ex rel. J.V.G. v. Van GuilderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Neilson ex rel. Crump v. BlanchetteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Neilson Ex Rel. Crump v. BlanchetteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Allen Watkins & Janis Clark, Appellant's V. Esa ManagementCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
- Allen Watkins & Janis Clark, Appellant's V. Esa ManagementCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.