Legal Opinion
Knight v. Knight
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 14, 2014No. 43687-6-IIPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPenoyar, J.
¶1 Dagmar Knight and her son Tor Knight appeal the superior court’s entry of a vulnerable adult protection order. Dagmar’s1 other son, Eric Knight, petitioned for the vulnerable adult protection order on Dagmar’s behalf against Tor. Dagmar and Tor argue that Eric was required to prove the need for the protection order by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence and the superior court imposed the most restrictive conditions in the protection order in violation of RCW 74.34.005(6). Eric, Dagmar, and Tor request attorney fees on appeal. In the published portion, we hold that a petitioner’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. O'CONNELLWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Morse v. AntonellisWashington Supreme Court · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Rebecca Nelson v. James DuvallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Doe v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- In Re The Detention Of A.f.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- Carmella Margarita Louise Desean v. Isaiah SangerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
- Dana M. Condrey v. Neil Connor FuchsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.